Global sales of smartphones will increase by 2.3% in 2025 compared to last year, according to a new report from IDC.

Android-based phones are expected to account for most of the increase, including in China, where sales are expected to rise by 5.6% year over year. Apple’s smartphone sales are expected to dip in China, but rise elsewhere. “While iOS will decline 1.9% in China this year due to ongoing challenges, globally it is forecast to increase 1.8% thanks to strong growth in the US, Apple’s largest market, coupled with rapid growth of 18% and 9% [year over year] in emerging markets like India and Indonesia.”

Apple has made a push in recent years to build a market presence in India, in particular.

Over the next five years, IDC expects sales to remain high, but the average price of a smartphone is expected to slip from $434 this year to $424 in 2029.

Source:: Computer World

A senior US official chided the UK government on Tuesday for pressuring Apple to create a backdoor in its encryption — although the US law enforcers would like a backdoor of their own.

US national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard responded to an inquiry from two members of Congress, writing that she is concerned about the UK’s request.

“I share your grave concern about the serious implications of the United Kingdom, or any foreign country, requiring Apple or any company to create a backdoor that would allow access to Americans personal encrypted data,” Gabbard wrote in a letter, a copy of which was published by US Senator Ron Wyden. “This would be a clear and egregious violation of Americans’ privacy and civil liberties and open up a serious vulnerability for cyber exploitation by adversarial actors.”

The end of end-to-end encryption?

The issue of international rules about encryption — and specifically methods to undermine or even break end-to-end-encrypted communications — is a hot topic today.

Sweden, for example, asked secure messaging service Signal to create clear-text copies of all secure messages, something that Signal publicly refused to do. 

Similar efforts are being explored within the European Union as well as various European member states including France.

The incident that prompted Gabbard’s letter involved a UK attempt to pressure Apple to create a backdoor, something that Apple refused to do, causing UK regulators to temporarily back off.

Gabbard said government attorneys are trying to figure out if the UK move violated an earlier agreement between the two governments by even seeking the Apple backdoor.

“My lawyers are working to provide a legal opinion on the implications of the reported UK demands against Apple on the bilateral Cloud Act agreement. Upon initial review of the US and UK bilateral CLOUD Act Agreement, the United Kingdom may not issue demands for data of U.S. citizens, nationals, or lawful permanent residents, nor is it authorized to demand the data of persons located inside the United States,” Gabbard wrote in the letter. “The same is true for the United States — it may not use the CLOUD Act agreement to demand data of any person located in the United Kingdom.”

National security posture

But US law enforcement organizations would like their own backdoor to encrypted messaging, as a senior FBI official told an international conference last year.

Michela Menting, senior director at ABI Research, said she saw Gabbard’s letter as US posturing: “This is an unclassified letter so clearly the US wants to show that it is trying to faithfully adhere to bilateral accords.”

That mismatch between Gabbard’s protest and the FBI’s wishlist comes down to who is making the request.

“I’m sure the US is probably seeking the exact same thing from Apple as the UK is. It doesn’t, however, like to be undercut by the UK in this regard,” Menting said: “Reading between the lines, if anyone is to have a backdoor into a US company, it should be a US national agency. It’s a diplomatically worded ‘tut tutting’ if you will, a little tap on the hand to say, ‘hands off’.”

Source:: Computer World

By Siôn Geschwindt Gene-edited pig livers, synthetic embryos, and 3D-printed tissue implants… the world of organ transplantation is becoming increasingly bizarre as scientists explore high-tech ways to keep people alive.  These experiments are birthing new business opportunities. One company cashing in is University of Oxford spinout OrganOx, which this week secured $142mn in funding to fuel its expansion in the US as it mulls a potential IPO.     OrganOx’s Metra machine pumps oxygenated blood and nutrients through the liver, mimicking natural conditions during a transplant. This helps the organ stay healthier for up to 12 hours longer than traditional methods — giving doctors more…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

By Deepti Pathak Have you ever wanted to take your favorite YouTube music or podcasts wherever you go? Downloading…
The post How to Download Audio from YouTube? appeared first on Fossbytes.

Source:: Fossbytes

By Hisan Kidwai Managing multiple online businesses on the same device—whether e-commerce, social media, or crypto—can be challenging, especially…
The post How to Grow your Online Businesses with AdsPower Anti-Detect Browser? appeared first on Fossbytes.

Source:: Fossbytes

Chinese cloud provider Alibaba has released four versions of its video-generation AI model as open source, allowing users to download and run them for free on capable PCs.

The Wan2.1 text-to-video model “excels at generating realistic visuals by accurately handling complex movements, enhancing pixel quality, adhering to physical principles, and optimizing the precision of instruction execution,” the company said in a blog post.

The model is a free alternative to OpenAI’s Sora video-generation model, which created waves when it was commercially released last year. Sora is part of ChatGPT Plus plan and costs $20 per month with per-month limits of up to 50 videos at 480p resolution and fewer 720p videos. Another option, Google’s Veo 2 is only available to select users.

The four Wan2.1 models “are designed to generate high-quality images and videos from text and image inputs,” Alibaba said.

The models have between 1.3 billion and 14 billion parameters to generate videos lasting a few seconds at a resolution up to 720p video. It’s not clear whether the company plans to release a model capable of generating 1080p video.

Video generation AI could be a useful productivity tool, but it has a long learning curve, said Jack Gold, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. “A lot of models are rudimentary,” he said. “You aren’t making three-hour movies out of it. It’s still early days.”

Gold likened video-generation AI models today to word processors in the 1980s, which got better over time. What’s different with AI is that users are feeding information to the model.

“From the perspective of an enterprise user, the question is — what am I giving away for free? A lot of these programs are going to learn from what you use them for,” Gold said.

Even so, the open-source text-to-video model gives enterprise users something they never had, said Karl Freund, founder and principal analyst at Cambrian AI Research. 

“It’s going to be a huge market,” Freund said, with a lot of interest from creative, media, and enterprise users.

Freund said enterprises spend a lot of money on multimedia, with many text-to-image generation models from Adobe, OpenAI, Google and X.AI already being used in the cloud.  Video is the next step.

Chinese AI providers are already shaking up the market, with Alibaba’s Wan2.1 the latest to arrive. The DeepSeek chatbot tool, for example, demonstrated advances made by Chinese companies in AI, and Wan2.1 demonstrates progress in video models. Also in the mix: Microsoft and Amazon, which now offer DeepSeek R1 through their cloud services. 

“We’ve always believed that no single model is right for every use case, and customers can expect all kinds of new options to emerge in the future,” Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman said in a LinkedIn post last month.

As they did with DeepSeek, cloud providers may take Wan2.1 and offer it through their own services to generate revenue, Freund said.

The analysts were mixed about security concerns that could arise from the video-generation model. Gold pointed out the Wan2.1 model could be used maliciously to generate deepfakes.

“There’s bad and good with everything,” he said.

The Chinese origins of the model also concerned Gold, but it is open for inspection and open-source advocates will comb through it as they did with DeepSeek.

The models are available for download on Alibaba Cloud’s AI model community, Model Scope and via Hugging Face, which also hosts public AI models such as Meta’s Llama, Microsoft’s Phi and Google’s Gemma.

Source:: Computer World

The CEO of Signal said Tuesday that the service will leave Sweden rather than comply with a rule that will require vendors to capture all secure messages and save a plain text copy, in case authorities later want to subpoena that data.

But the issue goes far beyond one secure messaging company and one government’s regulators. The European Union is considering similar regulations (many of them requiring backdoors to the data, which is even more problematic than simply saving a copy), as are the UK, France, and several other jurisdictions, including the US. If enough of those regulators insist on being able to access secure communications, it raises the issue of whether encrypted communications can be effectively used by any business.

“In practice, this means that we are asked to break the encryption that is the foundation of our entire operation. Asking us to store data would undermine our entire architecture, and we would never do that. We would rather leave the Swedish market entirely,” Signal CEO Meredith Whittaker told a Swedish news organization. “If we create a vulnerability based on Swedish demands, it would create a way to undermine our entire network.”

Earlier this month, a similar effort was attempted in the UK with Apple encryption. Apple pushed back, and the UK regulators, for the moment, backed off. 

Indeed, Signal also ran into something very similar with UK regulators two years ago. When it objected, the UK regulators withdrew their request.

In many jurisdictions, regulators have been pushing for such access for ostensibly legitimate reasons, such as cracking down on child pornography or organized criminal organizations that are using encryption to hide from law enforcement. 

But Fred Chagnon, principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, argues that such well-intended efforts are doomed to fail, and will deliver negative side effects. 

If such rules breaking encryption are enforced, the bad guys will simply use alternative methods to hide their actions, Chagnon said, whereas people who truly need to have conversations outside the earshot of authoritarian regimes will be severely hurt.

There is also a practical problem with Sweden’s demand that a copy of messages be retained in clear text. Even though the data is intended to be retained in case law enforcement later needs it, once saved, it could also be accessed by any group breaking into that vendor’s systems. 

“Governments pursuing encryption [access] are playing a dangerous game of short-sightedness. This isn’t about one app or one country. It’s about the fundamental right to secure communication,” Chagnon said. “By forcing Signal to compromise its core security, they’re signaling that end-to-end encryption is essentially outlawed. This creates a precedent where private, secure communication becomes impossible. Introducing a backdoor isn’t a fix. It’s a systemic failure, creating a permanent vulnerability that can only be temporarily mitigated with compensating controls. Inevitably, these controls will fail. The platform’s lack of security is, therefore, a feature, not a bug.”

Chagnon said that this back-and-forth vendor-to-regulator dynamic could quickly change if/when regulators find a vendor who is willing to let regulators access secure communications.

“Every time there is [vendor] capitulation, it makes it exponentially harder to win the next fight. It’s inevitable that some government will find a way to find some company [to agree] and that will make a precedent,” Chagnon said. “I don’t think governments are thinking about the unintended consequences. They used to be able to tap everyone’s phones. They are trying to get back to that standard.”

Michela Menting, senior director at ABI Research, mostly agreed with Chagnon, but also said that she had less fear that these regulatory efforts to undermine encryption would ever succeed.

“Governments have been threatening to mandate backdoors into encryption protocols for a long time, and they are never successful. These pronouncements by well-meaning but misinformed politicians are often a lot of bluster, and the debate seems to resurface cyclically,” Menting said. “No good can ever come of putting in backdoors to encryption, not when so much of the world’s modern communication relies on it to guarantee privacy and confidentiality.”

She also said that, in turbulent political times, good cops can quickly morph into bad actors.

“As we see today, even democratic countries that imbue such rights in law can start swinging towards authoritarianism,” she said. That makes it “so important that encryption isn’t unduly tampered with, for whatever reason.”

Menting stressed that she did not have serious concerns that encryption would be meaningfully hurt by those efforts. 

“It would be highly unlikely for a domino effect, whereby governments around the world start calling for backdoors into encryption protocols, and, heaven forbid, the underlying primitives, forcing vendors to pull out of doing business in those countries,” Menting said. “And it is highly unlikely that enterprises would start creating their own messaging apps. That would start becoming highly prohibitive in terms of cost, and in any case, there aren’t enough cryptographic experts available around the world anyway to do that.”

Another analyst, Heidi Shey, principal analyst for security and risk at Forrester, said enterprises also should be discouraging their people from using consumer-grade apps such as Signal anyway.

“In many situations, enterprises should not be using consumer apps like WhatsApp and Signal for business purposes. There are enterprise apps for secure communications that address concerns such as regulatory compliance, data sovereignty, as well as targeted attacks on and surveillance of their communications,” Shey said. “Such apps will have capabilities for managing data retention, metadata security, assurance, and more. In Europe, this includes enterprise apps from providers like Element, Salt Communications, Threema, and Wire.”

Source:: Computer World

By Siôn Geschwindt Venus Williams is most famous for being one of the best tennis players of all time, but she’s also a prolific angel investor. In her latest business move, Williams has backed French startup WeWard. WeWard is a free app that offers real-world rewards for walking. It tracks your steps and lets you earn points (called “Wards”), which can be exchanged for gift cards, donations, or discounts. The goal is to encourage people to be more active while benefiting from their daily movement. Williams has invested an undisclosed sum in the company and will also act as an ambassador. WeWard, meanwhile, has…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

By Siôn Geschwindt An AI-powered note-taking app developed by Munich-based startup Bliro could offer a more secure way to transcribe audio. Bliro uses natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to extract relevant information from in-person or virtual conversations. It then generates structured meeting notes and automates follow-up tasks. So far, pretty standard.  However, unlike popular transcription tools like Otter, Fireflies, or Notta, Bliro isn’t a bot that hops onto your call, records an audio file, and then transcribes it. Instead, the platform transcribes in real-time, ensuring that no audio recordings of conversations are ever created.  This guarantees compliance with strict privacy and…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

By Siôn Geschwindt German startup Proxima Fusion — whose team includes engineers from MIT, Google, SpaceX, and McLaren — has unveiled a fusion energy reactor design it believes offers the quickest route to commercially viable fusion power. Dubbed Stellaris, the machine is a quasi-isodynamic (QI) stellarator with high-temperature superconducting (HTS). This type of reactor uses complex, twisted magnetic fields to confine hot plasma, creating the conditions needed for fusion reactions. “Stellaris is designed to operate in continuous mode and be intrinsically stable,” Francesco Sciortino, Proxima’s co-founder and CEO, told TNW. “No other fusion power plant design has yet been demonstrated to be capable…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

Proposed cuts at a key US government agency will likely mean the demise of CHIPS Act funding, which could effectively end the program and undermine efforts to reshore semiconductor manufacturing and research to the US.

Axios and Bloomberg on Tuesday reported that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) plans to cut 497 jobs this week. NIST, a non-regulatory agency within the US Department of Commerce (DoC), helps drive innovation and industrial competitiveness and oversees the CHIPS for America program.

Robert Maire, president of consulting firm Semiconductor Advisors, wrote in a blog post that the plan to cut NIST staff isn’t “bluff or negotiation tactic.” Instead, the layoffs signal a complete shift in direction under US President Donald J. Trump, he said.

“Trump made it clear over the last few days that he will institute 25% tariffs on imported semiconductor devices, so [it’s] obvious that strategy is shifting from incentivizing US chip production to penalizing imports instead,” Maire said. “This also lowers the likelihood of TSMC taking over Intel manufacturing, as giving top US chip production to Taiwan contradicts the new strategy.”

The Trump Administration, Maire said, hasn’t fully considered the impact of the cuts, since “100%” of AI chips, most Intel chips, all AMD chips, TSMC customers’ chips, and more than 80% of memory chips are imported — with the majority of them outside the US.

“Obviously chip manufacturing companies will slow spending on programs they previously thought they were getting CHIPS Act funding for, if not cancel those projects outright,” Maire said. “If I were running a chip company, I would not count on CHIPS Act funding — even if I had a signed contract, as its clearly not worth the paper it’s written on if NIST is eviscerated.”

Industry analysts have agreed in the past that tariffs on imports will act as a penalty on the industry, while the CHIPS Act — hallmark legislation passed three years ago under then-President Joseph R. Biden Jr. — acts an incentive.

Jack Gold, principal analyst with tech industry research firm J. Gold Associates, has called Trump’s plan to enact tariffs on oversea chip makers is simply “wrong.” Funds already granted under the CHIPS Act should be safe if transferred, but with NIST staff cuts, the program could stall without oversight, he said.

“Ending it would be a mistake,” Gold said, arguing that incentives work better than tariffs for bringing chip manufacturing back to the US. If funding is pulled, companies like Intel might halt their projects, as they likely can’t replace the lost funding, he added.

“I don’t know how the companies (Intel and others) would replace the funding if it gets pulled,” Gold said. “In fact, I think it’s unlikely and the chip guys would just shutter whatever they are building, at least for the near term.”

The issue goes beyond CHIPS funding, Gold added, saying program cuts will hurt local communities expecting new facilities that would create jobs, pay taxes, and boost the economy. Areas such as Ohio, where projects were planned, “will miss out,” he said. And, local politicians in states expecing the grant monies, including New York, Ohio, Texas, and Arizona, are likely unhappy, he said.

“As for why Trump and company would do this, I think it’s just a short sighted view of, ‘Let’s cut all spending, without regard for what that spending ultimately means.’ As I said, you can’t accomplish bringing back manufacturing to the US simply by penalizing with tariffs. It won’t work,” Gold said. “Besides, it takes three to four years to build out a new fab, so imagine that amount of tariffs going into our products. What doesn’t have a chip in it these days? We will all be paying more for things.”

The CHIPS Act was passed overwhelmingly in 2022 by both houses of Congress to address computer chip supply chain shortages that surfaced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The legislation provided the Commerce Department with $52.7 billion for a suite of programs to “revitalize” the US position in semiconductor research, development, and manufacturing.

To date, the DoC has allocated, but not dispensed, about $32 billion in funding among chipmakers, including Intel, Samsung, Micron, TSMC, and Texas Instruments, all of whom have unveiled plans for a number of new US chip fabrication plants. In return, those chip designers and makers have pledged about $300 billion in current and future projects in the US, according to the White House under Biden.

The CHIPS Act has spurred $450 billion in private investment across 28 states, creating 58,000 jobs, according to the Semiconductory Industry Association. 

With the CHIPS Act spurring them on, the likes of Qualcomm, in partnership with GlobalFoundries, also said it would invest $4.2 billion to double chip production in its Malta, NY, facility.

Despite widespread bipartisan backing, some members of Congress expressed concerns about certain provisions, such as the level of government subsidies or the potential for the bill to benefit only a few large tech companies. Still, the majority of both Democrats and Republicans recognized the strategic importance of boosting semiconductor production on US soil.

In addition to Trump’s opposition, House Speaker Mike Johnson said in 2024 that Republicans would likely repeal the CHIPS Act. Johnson, who voted against the measure, later walked his comments back, saying he would like to “streamline” it, according to The Associated Press.

Source:: Computer World

Atlassian’s Trello project management tool has received a facelift with features designed to organize meetings and ideas in a cohesive manner.

The new features include an inbox, a planner, and a mix of add-ons and generative AI (genAI) tools to help customers summarize emails, organize meetings, and quickly sort through the barrage of pop-ups appearing in the software.

“In the past, Trello had kind of veered in the direction of project management because you were planning — and helping people plan — bigger and more complex projects. Now we are redirecting the focus on an individual task management,” said Gaurav Kataria, head of product for Trello at Atlassian.

With the update, Trello focused on simplicity, ease of use, and helping individual users be more productive, Kataria said. The company highlighted two specific features: Inbox and Planner, which are currently in beta. The AI-based inbox, for instance, serves to collect and summarize key action points and organizes to-do lists collected from a variety of collaborative and productivity apps. Planner serves to coordinate scheduling and tasks.

The new features are built atop current features that include to-do lists and cards, which help users organize and complete projects. 

This represents a big shift for Trello, as the current feature set “has been pretty much the same for the last 14 years,” Kataria said.

A built-in large-language model (LLM) parses messages and can summarize key action items and dates, which are then organized as a to-do list in the Inbox. Users can read those summaries in the inbox, then use the Planner feature to organize meetings in the calendar.

For example, knowledge workers are often drowning in emails, Slack messages, Microsoft Team messages and notifications that come from applications that might include Salesforce and Workday. 

“The most common use cases — just forward everything on to one single to-do list and have the AI summarize it. By far, this is the killer use case,” Kataria said.

There are many ways to forward a message to Trello’s inbox. For example, a user can forward a meeting reminder email on Google to Trello, which then adds it. A Slack message about a meeting can be tagged and saved to the Inbox. Apple’s Siri can also be used to send notes or reminders to the inbox.

The new features will become generally available in six weeks to paid users. They will not be available to freemium users. 

Atlassian is also known for Jira, its enterprise product management tool. Companies can import data from Jira into Trello and vice versa. 

“A lot of teams have graduated from Trello to Jira for project management needs, but use Trello for individual productivity. That’s where there’s a clear separation between Trello and Jira. But at the same time, they…nicely integrate with each other,” Kataria said.

Trello’s structural approach and interface make it easy to manage work and serves as a major on-ramp to other Atlassian products, said Wayne Kurtzman, research vice president  of social, communities and collaboration at IDC.

“Making Trello a personal work hub shows promise, as long as features and interface evolve with their technical audience,” Kurtzman said.  

In addition to other vendors in the collaborative work management segment, challenges could come from unexpected places as competitors focus on workflow automation.

“Atlassian has to balance the expectations of their Trello base with the desire to onboard them to Jira,” Kurtzman said. “If done with care, making Trello a personal product with team abilities could accomplish this.”

Source:: Computer World

By Siôn Geschwindt As the US and China pursue dominance in the global technology race, concerns are mounting among European founders that the region’s entrenched bureaucracy is impeding its capacity for innovation and growth. The EU is going “overboard on tech regulation,” said Job van der Voort, CEO and founder of Remote, an HR tech company valued at over $3bn. “It’s stifling innovation and it’s a massive risk for Europe.” Van der Voort told TNW that many business leaders share his view. “Most entrepreneurs agree this is a huge problem,” he said.   Indeed, such concerns are being raised with growing frequency. At a…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

By Hisan Kidwai Every year, millions fall victim to phishing scams and lose their valuable data – or, in…
The post How to Stay Safe Against Phishing & Social Engineering Attacks? appeared first on Fossbytes.

Source:: Fossbytes

By Hisan Kidwai If you’ve recently purchased a surprise gift for a loved one—or something you’d rather keep private—deleting…
The post How to Hide Amazon Orders & Clear Browsing History? appeared first on Fossbytes.

Source:: Fossbytes

Polish company Clone Robotics has unveiled Protoclone, a human-like robot equipped with synthetic muscles and a polymer skeleton consisting of 206 bones.

The YouTube clip below shows Protoclone using its synthetic muscles to move.

Protoclone has a 500-watt electric pump as its heart and four cameras for eyes. In addition, the robot has 320 pressure-sensitive sensors and 70 inertial sensors, according to Ars Technica.

In the future, this kind of robot could eventually help around the household — for example, by cooking, washing dishes and doing laundry.

Source:: Computer World

By Siôn Geschwindt Dutch software firm Bird is moving most of its operations out of the Netherlands and opening new global hubs as it seeks a reprieve from “overregulation” in Europe, said co-founder and CEO Robert Vis. “The AI Act, financing, compensation, taxes, employment law — starting and running a company [in Europe] is hard,” Vis told TNW, adding that there are “too many disparate markets that are overregulated with no clear vision for the future while the world around us is changing.” Bird (formerly MessageBird) is one of the Netherlands’ leading tech scaleups, reaching unicorn status in 2018. Bird’s main product is…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

Apple plans to inject billions of dollars into the US economy, spending $500 billion in the US over the next four years and promising expansion, new manufacturing facilities, and big investments in advanced manufacturing and R&D.

The announcement follows last week’s meeting between Apple CEO Tim Cook, and US President Donald J. Trump. “We are bullish on the future of American innovation, and we’re proud to build on our long-standing U.S. investments with this $500 billion commitment to our country’s future,” Cook said. “We’ll keep working with people and companies across this country to help write an extraordinary new chapter in the history of American innovation.”

In a comment on Truth Social, Trump said the investment reflected Apple’s “faith in what we are doing, without which, they wouldn’t be investing ten cents. Thank you Tim Cook and Apple.”

It remains to be seen whether Apple’s investments will be enough to mitigate the administration’s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese goods. “They don’t want to be in the tariffs,” Trump said after meeting with Cook last week.

Apple announced a similar range of investments during the last term of the president, which did help protect iPhones against tariffs at that time.

What Apple is promising

It helps that Apple is one of America’s biggest taxpayers, having paid $75 billion in US taxes in the past five years. While some of those tax dollars should perhaps have been levied elsewhere, (as the EU insisted about Apple’s Irish tax breaks), the deeply nationalistic US administration most certainly wants that money paid at home.

Apple says its investment billions will be spent on a range of different things:

The company will double its Advanced Manufacturing Fund

It will build a new advanced manufacturing facility in Texas, where it will product Apple Intelligence servers.

It intends to launch a manufacturing academy in Michigan.

And it will invest more in R&D, including additional spending on silicon and AI development.

The $500-billion promise also includes its work with suppliers across the US, direct Apple hires, AI investments including data centers, and Apple TV+ productions in 20 states. The company currently claims to support more than 2.9 million jobs in the US.

What happens in Texas?

The factory in Houston, TX seems likely to attract the biggest focus. Apple’s big idea is to begin making Apple Intelligence servers there later this year, opening a 250,000-square-foot-server manufacturing center in which it promises thousands of jobs. 

What’s interesting about that promise is that it implies Apple intends to make a very large number of these servers and it means several things: that Apple will extend the services it offers via Private Cloud Compute; it intends wide international deployment of these servers; and (speculatively) it will offer these private cloud services as a business in its own right. An iOS developer might want to use space in the private cloud to provide AI services, for example.

None of these educated guesses could turn out correct, but a factory with thousands of employees is going to be producing something in very significant quantities. Apple will also expand data center capacity in North Carolina, Iowa, Oregon, Arizona, and Nevada.

Advanced Manufacturing Fund

Apple’s Advanced Manufacturing Fund has made some key investments in support of third-party innovation as it is applied to Apple products in the past — think about Corning Glass, for example. The latest promise includes a massive $10 billion investment in skills development at Apple’s planned academy in Detroit, MI and billions in support of TSMC’s Fab 21 plant in Arizona.

And with a view to Industry 3.0, the Apple Manufacturing Academy will consult with small and mid-sized companies on implementing AI and smart manufacturing techniques. It will provide free in-person and online courses, with a skills development curriculum that teaches workers skills like project management and manufacturing process optimization.

In the national interest

What is interesting is the extent to which Apple today can make significant investments in the US that were perhaps less possible during the first Trump Presidency.

Today’s Apple is significantly less umbilically connected to China, for example. It is putting in place a distributed manufacturing and supply chain and has been working hard with key suppliers such as TSMC to bring at least some production to the US. That will include processor production in Arizona. Apple will never be able to base all its manufacturing in the US, but the promise of tens of thousands of additional jobs does mean something. 

It is also highly significant that much of Apple’s promises relate to artificial intelligence — including skills, manufacturing, and R&D. That matters because AI development is quite clearly in the US national interest, and Apple’s multi-billion dollar investment in the field will make a significant difference to US tech power.

You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky,  LinkedIn, Mastodon, and MeWe. 

Source:: Computer World

By Siôn Geschwindt Europe’s biggest food delivery firm Just Eat Takeaway.com is set to be acquired by tech investor Prosus for €4.1bn, in one of the biggest acquisitions in the history of Dutch tech.  Prosus — the investment arm of South African tech firm Naspers — has agreed to buy Just Eat Takeaway’s shares at €20.30 each in an all-cash offer. That’s a 22% premium over the delivery app’s recent three-month high but only a fifth of its pandemic-era peak of above €100 per share. Following the announcement, Just Eat Takeaway’s shares climbed 53% on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange this morning. Just Eat…This story continues at The Next Web

Source:: The Next Web

By Deepti Pathak Blox Fruits is a well-known game on Roblox where your race plays a big role in…
The post What is the Best Race in Blox Fruits? appeared first on Fossbytes.

Source:: Fossbytes